Joe Biden’s leadership has been a subject of concern within conservative circles, with criticisms ranging from his alleged cognitive decline to questions about who holds the real power in the White House. Recent undercover investigations by O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) shed light on what they claim to be the true power structure within the Biden administration.
According to Tyler Robinson, a special advisor to the chief of staff of SBA administrator Isabel Guzman, Jeff Zients, Biden’s chief of staff, wields considerable influence. Robinson suggests that Zients is “the second most powerful person in Washington,” indicating that his decisions often reflect the president’s stance.
Robinson’s revelations also touch on the involvement of prominent figures like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in White House affairs. He acknowledges Obama’s continued influence and indicates that Clinton maintains close ties with senior personnel in the administration.
Moreover, Robinson exposes a strategy where Guzman is directed by the White House to campaign for the president under the guise of official travel. This tactic, aimed at aiding Democrat candidates in swing states, has raised concerns about potential violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activities.
The example of Montana’s upcoming Senate race illustrates how this strategy plays out, with Guzman’s visits strategically excluding Republican officials. Robinson’s account suggests a coordinated effort from within the White House to influence elections in favor of Democratic candidates.
The role of Jeff Zients, as described by Robinson, paints a picture of significant influence and decision-making authority. Zients, with a background spanning public and private sectors, is portrayed as a key figure shaping policy and administration actions.
O’Keefe’s report highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government operations, particularly concerning potential abuses of power and misuse of federal resources for political purposes. These revelations underscore broader concerns about the integrity of electoral processes and the role of unelected officials in shaping national policies.