The wheels on the runaway impeachment train are beginning to wobble, as each new revelation raises additional questions concerning the motives behind the impeachment hoax
Yesterday’s news cycle raised more than a few eyebrows. We learned, for example, thanks to the New York Times and Fox News that congressman Adam Schiff lied to the American people when he exclaimed during an MCNBC interview on September 19th that no one on his staff had any contact with the Whistleblower BEFORE actually filing the complaint.
This astounding piece information first reported by the Times through a Schiff aid acknowledges that the whistleblower contacted Schiff’s congressional office asking for advice on how to proceed with the complaint. The Schiff aid advised the whistleblower to seek legal counsel providing names for him to contact, while also “walking him” through the whistleblower process, moreover the rules governing a whistleblower complain was apparently changed around the same time to accommodate second-hand knowledge.
An indignant President Trump upon hearing the news quickly pounced on the shifty bug-eyed congressmen, calling him a “low-life” for flagrantly abusing his power by willfully lying once again to the American people.
Fox’s senior political analyst Brit Hume was asked about the changing impeachment landscape and in particular Congressmen Schiff’s misinformation campaign.
“I think the answer is obvious. He knew how it would look. So he gave this answer, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.” If by “we” he meant only himself, he’s being slippery. If by “we” he meant himself and his staff, he lied.”
— Brit Hume (@brithume) October 2, 2019
Hume also speculated that President Trump’s assertion the staff members within Schiff’s congressional office helped compose the whistleblower complaint, which would constitute a grievous error in the protocol.
Another blockbuster piece of news came from Fox which obtained a copy of Giuliani’s notes from his January 2019 interview with fired Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin in which he claimed that his “investigations stopped out of fear of the United States.”
“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.
Shokin’s case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” and he was fired as per Vice President Biden’s demand.
“There were requests for information on Hunter Biden to which nothing was received,” Shokin said, according to the notes. “It is believed that Hunter Biden receives a salary, commission plus one million dollars. There were no documents or information on Hunter Biden, and Mr. Shokin stated he was warned to stop by Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt.”
Furthermore, Giuliani has stated to Fox News Shokin is willing to travel to America as a witness…can you feel the wheels on the impeachment train dislodging further?
Moreover, The hysteria regarding impeachment is a clever hoax perpetrated by disgruntled and disingenuous Democrats attempting to once again fool the American people into believing that Democrats are actually going through the process of a legitimate impeachment inquiry when NO VOTE, within the House of Representatives for an IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY has yet been taken…this is all smoke and mirrors designed to undercut the 2020 election, hoping that misinformed voters will believe that the President did something wrong, when in fact just the opposite is true.
The ruse began when House Speaker Pelosi went in front of the American people with a bizarre announcement claiming she was conducting a formal IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, without actually taking a House vote that would’ve put all Democrats on the record as mandated under ARTICLE II SECTION-4 of the CONSTITUTION, regarding a formal IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.
To do so would put vulnerable moderate Democrats in peril, after flipping Republican districts during the midterm election, capturing over 30-House seats that President Trump had won in 2016, thus the parlor game played by Pelosi, appearing to be serious and somber.
One Comment
Ted R. Weiland
This entire impeachment circus is just the latest diversion in a never-ending litany of diversions keeping Americans from focusing on the real battle.
If you’re not in a battle, you should be. You just want to make sure it’s the right battle.
If you’re in a battle to allegedly save the Republic (including President Trump) from the Democrats, you’re in the wrong battle.
If it’s the right battle, please provide me with *anything* that biblically supports Christians spending time, effort, and money to save one form of secular humanism from another form of secular humanism.*
It’s tantamount to an ancient Israelite trying to save the Canaanite’s Baal government from the Philistine’s Dagon government.
In trying to save the biblically adverse Constitutional Republic born of the biblically seditious Constitution, alleged Christians and patriots have all-but lost the Kingdom of Christ here on earth to the anti-Christ’s and non-Christians.
You’re only helping perpetuate your posterity’s spiritual and physical slavery.
The real battle can only be defined within a biblical paradigm – that is, anything opposed to Yahweh, God of the Bible, as Sovereign over everything, including government, and thus His moral law as supreme.
And what stands in the way of this more than anything else? Today’s national idol known as the United States Constitution.**
This is *our* battle front, the front lines for King and kingdom. Anything else is merely fighting for the enemy.
For more, see our featured blog article “5 Reasons the Constitution is Our Cutting-Edge Issue” at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/
*What makes a government secular is its rejection of Yahweh as its Sovereign and thus His moral law as supreme. Case in point: The Constitutional Republic.
**Idolatry is not so much about statues as it is statutes, such as what considers the supreme law of the land. Such as promoted Article 6 of the Constitution.